SAMR vs. TPACK

TPACK in 3 minutes
SAMR explained

This week, we read about the TPACK vs. the SAMR model.  The SAMR model looks at how technology is used in the classroom.  S = Substitution, A = Augmentation, M = Modification, and R = Redefinition.  The idea is that our goal should be redefinition, that we are not using technology to do something we can do without technology (such as write a paper on a word processor instead of with a pencil and paper), but instead to have a completely redesigned task that is impossible to do without technology (such as a video instead of a written paper).  One limitation of the SAMR model, I believe, is the focus on "technology is better," without question.  I believe that teachers ought not to only teach students information, but teach students how to think, how to process information, and how to gather information on their own.  You can have the most beautiful presentation, but the content remains the most important part.  Conversely, a brilliant speech or lecture may not need, and in fact may be impeded, by technology.

In contrast, the TPACK model looks at areas of KNOWLEDGE: technology, content, and pedagogy.  It says that having knowledge in all three areas results in the best teaching.  It is this model that I most identified with and agreed with.  Perhaps it is here that my age shows, but I do not like the "technology for the sake of technology."  I think sometimes the heart of true learning can get lost in all of the 'bells and whistles.'  Understanding that it's not only important to know technology and how to use it, but also to know both HOW to teach and WHAT you teach (your subject matter).  One limitation of the TPACK model, however, is that it does not tell you HOW to apply the technology.  But it does focus on the dangers of applying technology for technology's sake.